MQL Cohort Performance | Q1 2026 vs Prior Quarters
Pearlfinders · Marketing Analytics

MQL Cohort Performance: Q1 2026 vs Prior Quarters

All opportunities created from MQLs, grouped by the quarter the MQL arrived, taken from your campaign tagging in Primary Campaign Source. Fiscal quarters: Q1 Apr–Jun, Q2 Jul–Sep, Q3 Oct–Dec, Q4 Jan–Mar. 1,247 MQLs and 506 opportunities across six quarterly cohorts.
Read this first: the Q1 2026 cohort (Apr–Jun 2026) ended barely two weeks ago and is not yet mature — 32 of its 86 opportunities (37%) are still open, worth £196k. Q1 2025 is fully closed. Every comparison below separates what has already happened from what is still in play.
MQLs · Q1 2026
175
−19% vs Q1 2025 (216) · −51% vs Q4
Opps created · Q1 2026
86
−22% vs Q1 2025 (110)
Closed won so far
3
Q1 2025 finished on 41
Won revenue so far
£17.3k
−93% vs Q1 2025 (£231k)
Still open
32
£196k pipeline in play
Win rate on closed deals
5.6%
51 already lost · Q1 2025: 37.6%
Avg won deal size
£5,750
Stable across all quarters (£5.5–5.8k)
Head-to-head: Q1 2026 vs…
MetricQ1 2025 (Apr–Jun 25)Q1 2026 (Apr–Jun 26)Difference
Q1 2026 figures marked * are provisional — 32 deals (£196k) still open. Comparison quarters are fully or almost fully closed.
Full funnel: MQLs → Opportunities → Wins

Funnel volume per quarter

Every MQL in the period, including those that never became opportunities. Q4 2025's MQL surge (+64%) did not translate into wins; Q1 2026's MQL volume halved vs Q4.

Funnel efficiency per quarter

MQL → opp conversion has recovered in Q1 2026 to near its Q1 2025 peak. The collapse is entirely in the final step: opp → win.
Volume & outcomes by cohort

Opportunities created per MQL quarter, by outcome

Q4 2025 produced the most opportunities on record (130) but the second-worst win rate — volume and quality have moved in opposite directions.

Win rate on closed deals

Won ÷ (won + lost). Q1 2026 shown as provisional — it can only improve as open deals close, but 51 losses are already banked.

Closed won revenue & open pipeline

Deal size is flat, so the revenue gap is entirely a conversion problem, not a pricing one.
Where the mix changed

Sector mix of each cohort

Marketing has grown to 50% of the Q1 2026 cohort. Charity & Arts — the best-converting sector in Q1 2025 — has shrunk to 22%.

Sector win rates on closed deals

Q1 2025's result was built on Charity & Arts converting at 52.6%. In Q1 2026 the same sector is 0 for 10 so far.
SectorQ1 25
Apr–Jun 25
Q2 25
Jul–Sep 25
Q3 25
Oct–Dec 25
Q4 25
Jan–Mar 26
Q1 26*
Apr–Jun 26

Where Q1 2026 can realistically land

Applying historical win rates to the 32 open deals (at the £5,750 average deal size), on top of the 3 wins already banked.
ScenarioExtra winsTotal winsEst. cohort revenuevs Q1 2025 (£231k)
Open deals convert like Q4 2025 (16.5%)58£46k−80%
Open deals convert at 2025 average (24.5%)811£63k−73%
Open deals convert like Q1 2025 (37.6%)1215£86k−63%
Every open deal closes won (ceiling)3235£201k−13%
Conclusions
01

The decline is structural, not seasonal

Closed-deal win rate has fallen every single quarter: 37.6% → 22.9% → 20.9% → 16.5%. Q1 2026 sits at 5.6% with 51 losses already banked. Even the best-case scenario leaves it well below every 2025 quarter.

02

The funnel breaks at the last step, not the first

Q1 2026's MQL → opp conversion (49.1%) is back at near-record levels — the MQLs coming in are qualifying well. But MQL → win has fallen 19.0% → 1.7%*. The leak is definitively opp → close, not lead quality at the top.

03

Q4's MQL surge bought volume, not revenue

Q4 2025 generated 355 MQLs (+64% vs any other quarter) but converted them to wins at 5.6% — the worst mature rate. More MQLs of the same kind won't fix Q1 2026; 175 well-qualifying MQLs are already producing opps at the best rate since Apr 2025.

04

Charity & Arts carried Q1 2025 and has gone missing

Q1 2025's outperformance was largely one sector: Charity & Arts won 20 of 38 closed deals (52.6%). In Q1 2026 it's a smaller share of the cohort and 0 wins from 10 closed. Recovering this sector is the single biggest lever.

05

Marketing is absorbing budget it can't convert

Marketing is now 50% of the cohort (43 opps) but has converted 1 of 30 closed deals (3.3%). The mix has shifted towards the sector converting worst.

06

Intent looks higher upstream, so the leak is downstream

Demo Requests became the #1 lead source in Q1 2026 (29 opps, vs 24 in Q1 2025) — a stronger intent signal — yet conversion collapsed. That points at lead quality within source, sales-stage conversion, or competitive/pricing pressure rather than a weaker top of funnel.

07

£196k is still on the table

21 of the 32 open deals are at Demo Done or later (12 at proposal, 9 at final offer, 4 verbal). Closing these well is worth more than any new campaign this quarter — the gap between the 16.5% and 37.6% scenarios is £40k.

Methodology. MQL quarter derived from the Primary Campaign Source prefix (e.g. "Q1 2026 Marketing | Email Marketing") — i.e. your campaign tagging, not opportunity close dates. Fiscal year runs April to March, so Q1 2026 covers Apr–Jun 2026 and Q4 2025 covers Jan–Mar 2026. 19 opportunities from non-quarterly campaigns (MAD//Fest 2025, MAD//North 2025, ESA, and others; 5 won, £32k) are excluded from quarterly cohorts. 4 "Closed – Overdue" records are excluded from win/loss calculations. Q2 2026 (4 opps, all open) is shown for completeness but is too early to read. Win rates are calculated on closed deals only (won ÷ won + lost). Source: Salesforce opportunity export, 13 July 2026.

MQL data. 1,247 MQLs (1 Apr 2025 – 13 Jul 2026), quartered by Created Date on the same Apr–Mar fiscal calendar. Counts include all account types; ~8% are existing-client or non-prospect records (101 Client, 19 Master/Ex Client/other). Prospect-only MQL → opp rates run 4–7 points higher but follow the same pattern (Q1 2025: 57.3%, Q1 2026: 50.9%). Q2 2026 covers only 1 Apr–13 Jul of quarter-to-date MQLs and is excluded from efficiency trends. Two duplicate MQL records retained as logged.